A letter to Invento-HQ and some other old/recent stuff
Being relatively new here I'm not yet familiar with all the features/functions of this site. I kind of "discovered" the blog section quite recently and then figured out that ... hm... those earlier lengthy posts (like http://kitelife.com/forum/topic/7093-welcome-exult/#comment-57515 or http://kitelife.com/forum/topic/5459-what-do-do-in-high-wind/?page=4#comment-57785 ) might better had been put in a KL-blog instead? Even after a month I'm still in the process of finding my way around here.
Agenda (as of now at least): I aim to cover parts of my dual line stunt kiting here by now and then sporadically writing reasonably well edited posts and blog posts that I would like to read myself. English is not my native language though. It is not only finding expressions that are spot on (which can slow down somewhat), but also avoiding unintended alternative meanings of words. E.g. the name I first intended instead of Exult turned out to be dubious I believe. Quite often I check what happens to the kite when you make a short flick on the lines in various situations without much subsequent feed back and try to see what the kite wants to do. Therefore I thought "Fling" would serve as a good descriptive forum name that describes the kites movement after the short tug. However, after carefully looking it up, it turned out that the alternative meaning might make it a good name in some other type of forum, which is very far from what I intended.
Reason for limiting to dual lines is because that is what I happen to do and know. Currently I feel a four line would distract to much in learning tricks at my current level and also from to some more extent for apply the contents of John Barresi's "Kite Flying with Intent" ( http://kitelife.com/kl-archive/flying-with-intent/ ) for my dual line kites. Later when reasonably through (???) with this I'd perhaps feel more ready for a 4-line challenge. Another aspect is, in a time that still feels distant, I imagine that 4-line kiting might add a few more kite active years. Dual line slack line tricks can certainly demand that you rapidly run downstreams, which at an age no longer might be possible.
When I come to think of it, there is more old but reasonably recent stuff that could make it into this blog, like this (second) e-mail to Invento-HQ and a kite retailer/source of mine:
Quote
To: Invento-HQ; Remix_Kiteshop/DB_Toys
From: "exult@a.perfectfield.se"
Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Re: Kite wedding gift - Re: Ogone: Confirmation of your orderDear Sir/Madam,
It turned out that there were others that also thought that the Tramontana/Prism-tail was a stunning appearance. I went to a kite festival last weekend in hope to find any dualline kiters (have not seen anyone for many years - there are very very few of them here). Since it was a festival I decided for the Tramontana/tail combo to give people something that they could understand. A bit to my surprise they handed out some prizes and I got the main one. I guess it was for appearance, but they also mentioned the constant effort of flying (well it was certainly not for building - made no secret of brands and from where I've bought them). Also there were many detailed questions from visitors.
It is totally incomprehensible why the Tramontana is hidden among the HQ retro kites! I can't find it in "http://www. a -link to a non-sponsor" ! There is no similar HQ kite that is being marketed that it could internally compete with. The handling is marvelous and the appearance is stunning. E.g. one of my friends at work refers to my Tramontana as "the nice looking kite". However if I could wish for a minor modification I'd like a little reinforcement around the hole in the sail around the centre cross.
I think it should be offered as a kite with high precision and stunning appearance and recommended to anyone beyond the lawn dart stage (however that the trickability is a bit limited, but is there to a limited extent, should be mentioned as well). Don't be shy - brag about it! The key point is that it should be evident that it makes a stunning appearance in the sky and it should be illustrated with a link to something like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciK46WvzbsU . However I think in a video intended to be promotional the turns could have been more square, some tricks added and a little groundwork to - especially very easy LE launches and cardweels are characteristic.
Tramontana is understandable and striking. I got serious in kiting after I saw a two person team flying routine at a kite festival - yes you guessed it: it was two Tramontana kites.Now over to the Salsa 3 I bought for the wedding gift - now after testing I don't understand the kite or its purpose! I bought it because it was robust and could take a few crashes, not so tricky (might suit a beginner) and that the version 3 of a kite should mean that someone bothers about how well the kite performs. The good part first - the kite didn't break during the beginners first session. Otherwise, performance-wise, I had difficulties in finding something I liked and that would make a good beginners kite. First when making a exaggerated input beginner style of turn (like more than 1dm difference in line position - the kite went on its back (not very beginner friendly). Second when I attempted to hold a stall I just couldn't with this kite. I think that the HQ Quickstep kite is more easily controlled, cheaper and much more suited for a beginner. Is there some hidden Salsa feature that I've missed here? Personally, if I've haven't given it away I'could have investigated/exploited the turn to turtle transition, but for the kite owner receiver this is not where he is on his learning curve. Could a scaled up (version 3/4 fullsize e.g.) of the Quickstep (XL) be something to replace the Salsa?
Best Regards,
"Exult"
There was no reply. OK, HQ is not a kite forum and might need to focus on working to get the bacon on the table.
10 Comments
Recommended Comments